|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comments
Well now that you don't have a car, it's not like you're going anywhere or anything ...
posted by *** Dave, October 30, 2003 02:26 PM
Man, I have no clue how to do any of that. I feel truly dim now. I could use the space that it might free up, though.
Damn. Now I am getting all obsessed right before NaNoWriMo. Geez.
posted by Brian Peace, October 30, 2003 04:00 PM
Oooh...
Heavy Pages!
Sucking HUUUUUUGE Amounts of Bandwidth!!
Costing you MEEEELLLIIIOOONNNSSS of Dollars to Host!!
Man, this guy ought to write for the Republican Party.
What these all-CSS-all-the-time dorks don't tell you is the difference in download time between a well coded table layout and a bleh CSS layout is measured in milliseconds. Now, when robots with brains the size of planets begin surfing the web, I will somehow manage to give a shite.
posted by Sekimori, October 30, 2003 04:45 PM
I agree with Seki that the hype over Tables vs CSS is overblown -- in some ways by Kids With A Keen New Toy, in other ways by Consultants Who Would Love To Show You How (For A Very Reasonable Fee).
Still, there are conveniences to stylesheets, and I find that, if the bandwidth is not significantly reduced, the quickness of drawing various parts can be sped up. Or, if done badly, slowed down.
posted by *** Dave, October 30, 2003 05:47 PM
Alternatively, you have to do the CSS right or it's going to look like crap going across platforms and there are too many so-called web designers out there that couldn't spell browser compatibility.
This comment best read while drinking Mountain Dew.
posted by secret asIAN man, October 31, 2003 04:42 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
