www average-bear
"Let them pick up the threesome fetish on their own."
« Moving forward | Main | "Is it time for bed?" »

  recent comments
· Julia
· Jackie
· NoelleFrost
· Rey
· NoelleFrost
· czeltic girl
· Rey
· Boulder Dude
· Randal Trimmer
· Randal Trimmer







I was listening to the radio this morning when a woman called in. To shorten up the long story, she found a porn DVD in her son’s room (aged 14). Having never seen/watched something of that nature herself (another long story) and being curious about both the contents of the disc and what her son was ‘in’ to, she watched it, then returned it to its hiding place and hasn’t said anything about it to the kid or her husband.

The calls that followed after that focused (of course) on the mother’s admission that she really liked the DVD, etc. etc., yawn, this is what will give us good ratings, etc.

My focus was on the offhand comments made by most of the parents calling in, that the kid having porn was ‘perfectly normal for his age’.

I disagree.

Now, before I get a bunch of ‘you’re a repressive bastard’ emails, let me clarify:

  • There’s nothing inherently wrong with porn.
  • It is natural for fourteen-year olds to be insanely curious about and/or (inner parental shudder) exploring sex.

Parents: you do not get to combine these two sentences into “There’s nothing inherently wrong with a fourteen year old insanely curious about and/or exploring porn.” Porn is not sex, it is an artifical visual stimulant, useful in the way any sex toy is useful. Most adults get that, because they know what normal relationships are like, they see the difference, and use the toy accordingly, along with (or not) whatever else trips their trigger.

Kids (news flash here) are not adults. A fourteen year old has no real basis for comparison between porn and a normal intimate relationship, thus the porn can become their imprinted idea of ‘normal’ (depending on the level of openess the parents display on the subject). THAT’S dangerous: it’s misleading and obviously not the place from which you want your kid to start his (cue dramatic music) journey into intimacy. Porn’s not an educational tool (okay, not this kind of education, anyway). I think that that’s the sort of thing that could seriously mess a kid’s social development up for a good long time.

So, summing up: nothing really wrong with porn, but it’s the sort of thing I think is best approached as a sex toy. Like any other sex toy, it should be included in a person’s life only after they understand what intimate relations are like without it.

That’s me. This is me getting off the soapbox.

Falling Down 10:20 AM, 01.28.03

Comments


I have to say that I completely agree with you.

posted by Lori, January 28, 2003 10:25 AM

[nods] There's a whole lot of difference between sex-education and, I don't know, call it "intimacy education." Sex you can learn everywhere and early. Knowing how to actually interact with people is a life-long process.

posted by MT Fierce, January 28, 2003 10:40 AM

Well said.

posted by *** Dave, January 28, 2003 11:37 AM

Amen brother...

posted by Captain Rooba, January 28, 2003 12:39 PM

Yet another nod of agreement...

posted by jenn, January 28, 2003 03:13 PM

Dude, I had NEVER thought of it that way before, and as I read it, it TOTALLY makes sense. If you don't mind, I'm gonna plagiarize the hell out of it in the future. ;)

posted by Big Daddy, January 28, 2003 06:55 PM

Allow me to join in the agreefest. And the possible borrowing of the ideal for future bloggage.

posted by Brian Peace, January 28, 2003 10:43 PM

When you put it that way, I guess I should stay away from the stuff.

posted by TC, January 29, 2003 12:54 AM


©Doyce Testerman. Terms of Use. CCL.